BOOK
REVIEW
Kuyper,
Abraham. The Problem of Poverty. Edited
by James W. Skillen. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House; and Washington, DC: The
Center for Public Justice, 1991. 94 pp. Paperback, $6.95.
Abraham
Kuyper, once a Dutch prime minister (1901-1905) and an influential neo-
Calvinist theologian addressed the opening address at the First Christian
Social Congress in the Netherlands, November 9, 1891. This speech was first
translated into English by Dirk Jellema and published Christianity and the
Class Struggle (Grand Rapids: Piet Hein, 1950). One hundred years later, James
W. Skillen re-edited this speech into a different form of English in the aim to
convey the original meaning and intent of Kuyper. Throughout the reading,
readers should note that the speech was taken in the year 1891 before the era
of Marxist-Leninist governments. Everyone had expected that socialism could be
a key ideology that promised change for the poor and challenge for the rich.
Revolution is greatly expected to be done. However, one hundred years later,
with socialism in decline, Marxism in disgrace, and capitalism in bankruptcy,
Skillen believes that Kuyper’s perspective on the problem of poverty must be
heard again. Kuyper argued that Christians must actively take part in bringing
redemption for poverty just as Jesus had done in the first place.
The Problem of Poverty projects two
different frameworks of Kuyper’s vision: the nature of religion and the
differentiation of society. Dominantly in the Western religion view, the
Westerners tend to marginalize their religion from society. There is a tense
connection between Christian and non- Christian over the social and economic
policies concerning the state. In this book, Kuyper persuades Christians to
“approach the social problem with all the distinctive resources available to
them in the biblical view of God, creation, and especially human nature” (17).
Whereas the second framework that Kuyper used highlighted the fact that the
life of society is meant to be more complex as history develops over time. If
Christians have the desire to take part in alleviating the problem of poverty,
then there is a need of integrating the Christian value with the various
aspects in the secular world such as through institutions, communities, and
social relationships.
Throughout the book, Kuyper advocates the
notion of learning from Jesus and his way of coping with the problem of
poverty. Kuyper declares Jesus as someone more than a social reformer (37). By
being a personal example and organizing the church, Jesus is the perfect
Christian example to alleviate poverty. In being a personal example, Jesus does
not merely limit his work to moral motivation (38). He directly came in contact
with the poor and oppressed. Not just by his teaching, he also implemented His
teaching with his practice of “devotion, self- denial, and abundant compassion
which pours every ounce of balm at his disposal into the wounds of suffering
mankind” (40). Through the ministry of the church, Kuyper put forward the three
important influences that Jesus had done through the ministry of the Word,
ministry of the charity, and the church as influenced society by instituting
the equality of brotherhood (41). In contrast to Jesus, socialism replaced
God’s authority by the individual free will, replaced the fallenness and the
need for conversion by natural human pride, the acceptance of egoism, and the
replacement of human dignity from organically integrated society under God into
self-seeking and self-serving individualism.
Abraham Kuyper’s views toward the problem
of poverty proposed a Calvinistic view towards the role of Christianity in
society, especially in diminishing the poverty problem. The idea of having
Christians to fully participate in the social problem and having Jesus as an
example demonstrates that Christians are not outdated. Biblical views could
always be integrated into every part of our lives. Therefore, I think that
Kuyper’s book is very helpful as a resource in the classroom for setting the
stage in the study of ideology and Christianity.
Comments
Post a Comment